I’ve known this one girl since I was 10. Sweet girl, we always got along relatively well. Except she’s Mormon. I’m gay. Those of you who know my partner and I personally know that there’s a bit more to the legal aspects of that, but the end result is the same: I only have relationships with men. This person who considers themself my friend wants to deny me the same kind of happiness and validation she shares with her husband (who she has been with for less time than Parker and I).
I consider myself an open minded person. I try not to dislike people simply because they have different opinions. I’ve always tried to see things from different viewpoints. However, I don’t know that I can continue to have a friendship with someone who quite obviously does not see me as their equal. It’s not as if she is completely sheltered and doesn’t realise that her vote for Proposition 8 hurts me personally, she’s known about my sexual orientation since we were in our early teens. Yet she continues to insist that marriage is a sacred partnership between one man and one woman.
I suppose I could understand that. At the very least, I understand that she is a religious woman and therefore her faith will have some bearing on her viewpoints. Except that she can’t explain to me why her views should be allowed to affect my rights. Particularly as she violated a rather strict Mormon tennant when she lived with her husband long before they were married. Why is it acceptable for her to ignore her own religious principles, but it’s not acceptable for me? A person who is not Mormon, has never been Mormon, and will never be Mormon. I’m not even Christian.
It’s the same problem I have with anyone who opposes same sex marriage. No one can give me a valid reason as to why their personal beliefs should affect my life. I’ve heard a myriad of reasons, but none that hold up under questioning. “The Bible says homosexuality is a sin.” First of all, that’s completely untrue once taken in context from the original, unadulterated translations. For that matter, David and Jonathan have what is clearly a same sex romance that is recognised in all ways other than legal. Second, I’m not Christian. I’m Jewish. Reform Jewish. My Rabbi is perfectly willing to perform same sex marriage ceremonies. The URJ has been doing this for decades. Why should your strict-interpretation beliefs infringe upon my rights?
“We cannot change a traditional ceremony.” Really? Why not? Moses had two wives, Abraham had three, Solomon had 700 with 300 concubines. If we’re not going for a Biblical context (after all, some of us are Buddhist), then up until the 1960s two people of different races could not get married in the US. For that matter, let’s look at minimum marriage age laws. Most states have now moved up to 18, but that’s rather recent. When our parents were growing up it wasn’t unusual for 15 year old teenagers to marry if the girl was pregnant and both sets of parents consented. Obviously we’re fine with changing the definition of marriage so long as both parties are heterosexual.
“Marriage is designed as a way to create families. Gay couples cannot bear children, therefore they don’t need to be married.” Many people either cannot or choose not to have children. Elderly couples, couples where one or both parties are infertile, childfree couples all can be married without having children. This also assumes that gay couples won’t adopt children or take advantage of current reproductive technology. Lesbian couples using artificial insemination and gay male couples having a surrogate are hardly unheard of. Do these children not deserve all the protections offered by having married parents?
“The country was founded on Judeo-Christian values that don’t allow for same sex marriage.” We also have a thing called seperation of church and state. It was designed by the founders for this express purpose. Founders who were not Christian. The vast majority were secular humanists or theists with no religious affiliation. They set up the country in such a way as to allow for religious freedom for all citizens. This includes not forcing your religious views on my life. I won’t try to force you to avoid leavened bread during Passover (thereby ruining all of your Easter desserts) and you don’t try to keep me from getting married.
“But then people will be able to marry their dog!” Now, I will admit that I made this joke at my first GSA meeting. In my defense, I was like 13 and wasn’t serious. I just forgot that not everyone understands my sense of humour. As far as actual, real world implications go, it’s impossible. A dog does not have legal standing. A dog is not legally capable of signing a contract. Therefore, a dog cannot be legally married to any person, place, or thing. The same is true of people under the age of 18. A minor is not capable of entering into a legal contract. When 16 year olds get married they must have parental permission. This does not change if the minor in question is gay.
“What about polygamists?” This is one where I mock the Mormons against gay marriage. Your religion doesn’t have the best record on “traditional” marriage, sweethearts! In fact, you only dropped polygamy because otherwise Utah wouldn’t have been allowed in the union. Don’t go acting like you’ve always been wholesome, all-American types. That said, I have nothing against consenual polyamory. I’ll go into detail later, but I’m actually poly. I believe that so long as all parties consent and are capable of giving consent no one should try telling them how to live their lives. This is why I’m pro-choice and pro-euthanasia. I don’t personally believe in either, but I can’t bring myself to tell other people how to live or die. Therefore, I really don’t care if three people or five or twenty all want to marry each other. I don’t care if one guy wants to have 50 wives (or one woman 50 husbands) so long as all the previous wives/husbands agree to the new addition. I realise that this isn’t going to bring anyone to my side, but I refuse to be ashamed of my beliefs.
“I don’t want my children to learn that homosexuality is valid.” Then don’t send them to public school. This is one of the very few times I believe in infringing upon the rights of others. Why? Because it’s for the public good. Back in the 1950s and 60s white parents didn’t want their children learning that black children were just as good as them. They didn’t want their children to learn that there didn’t have to be segregation. Now people who continue to hold those beliefs are seen as ignorant and backwards (at best). Times change, society moves on. In this case I think it’s for the better.
Any variation of “but those horrible homosexuals can’t raise children!”, usually in regards to adoption and fostering. Guess what? We already raise children. We raise healthy, happy children who are open minded and capable of loving anyone regardless of race, sex, gender, national origin, or any of the other lines that children raised in bigoted households fear to cross. In fact, children raised by same sex parents tend to fare better than those raised in heterosexual households. Why? Because up until recently the only option gay parents had was to adopt. When you adopt you are prepared for all of the expenses and stresses of child rearing simply because you have to go through an intensive approval process. What’s more, gay parents are almost always given the most “problematic” children that cannot be placed elsewhere. We’re told we will never be approved for a healthy child so instead we choose the baby with Down’s Syndrome or severe autism or fetal alcohol syndrome. If gay parents are so horrible, why do you continue to give us your most vulnerable children?
“Perhaps most important, the spread of the Gospel of Jesus Christ will be severely curtailed. The family has been God’s primary vehicle for evangelism since the beginning.” I’M JEWISH. I do not want your Christ, I have no need for your Christ. I have already been exposed to your interpretation of G-d, the Bible, and the nice, hippy Jewish boy you call a the messiah. I have no use for a group of people so hateful, so angry, so blinded by fear that they refuse to acknowledge the most important message of the man they believe died for their sins: Love Thy Neighbour.
I’ve tried explaining all of this to people before. I have tried to make them see that while I respect their views (even while I disagree), I cannot allow them to run my life. They refuse to do the same for me. If people who are against gay marriage would simply not attend gay weddings then I would have no problem with them. The trouble comes when they try to prevent me from attaining the same rights and benefits that every heterosexual person in this country enjoys. Hard as I try, I don’t think I can be friends with a person like that.
Tobias gay life, personal life, politics, social issues